Updates.

diff --git a/doc/FAQ b/doc/FAQ
index 18cd9e7af2c93bb9f7d38c4d0957fa860468b721..a55ad7f4633ebae08b7045d7c6fe7cae23fedb2d 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/FAQ
+++ b/doc/FAQ
@@ -30,8 +30,14 @@ A: SILC still has a lot things to do.  The time of completion is much
 Q: Why use SILC? Why not IRC with SSL?
 A: Sure, that is possible, although, does that secure the entire IRC
    network? And does that increase or decrease the lags and splits in
-   the IRC network?  SILC is not meant to be IRC replacement.  IRC is
-   good for some things, SILC is good for same and some other things.
+   the IRC network?  Does that provide user based security where some
+   specific private message are secured.? Does that provide security
+   where some specific channel messages are secured?  Security is not
+   just about applying encryption to traffic and SILC is not just about
+   `encrypting the traffic`.  You cannot make insecure protocol suddenly
+   secure just by encrypting the traffic.  SILC is not meant to be IRC
+   replacement.  IRC is good for some things, SILC is good for same and
+   some other things.
 
 
 Q: Can I use SILC with IRC client?  What about can I use IRC with SILC

diff --git a/public_html/faq.html b/public_html/faq.html
index aec23abfca7524f1e11ae9daebb15b4e6d40cd3a..a53c7958682e2c85aa81bc4a47f2d6f43a4ee6e2 100644 (file)
--- a/public_html/faq.html
+++ b/public_html/faq.html
@@ -42,8 +42,14 @@ A: SILC still has a lot things to do.  The time of completion is much
 <i>Q: Why use SILC? Why not IRC with SSL?</i><br>
 A: Sure, that is possible, although, does that secure the entire IRC
    network? And does that increase or decrease the lags and splits in
-   the IRC network?  SILC is not meant to be IRC replacement.  IRC is
-   good for some things, SILC is good for same and some other things.
+   the IRC network?  Does that provide user based security where some
+   specific private message are secured.? Does that provide security
+   where some specific channel messages are secured?  Security is not
+   just about applying encryption to traffic and SILC is not just about
+   `encrypting the traffic`.  You cannot make insecure protocol suddenly
+   secure just by encrypting the traffic.  SILC is not meant to be IRC
+   replacement.  IRC is good for some things, SILC is good for same and
+   some other things.
 <p><br>
 
 <i>Q: Can I use SILC with IRC client?  What about can I use IRC with SILC