From b7a67d63c712b0cee178b3dd90de0cbd159e81d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pekka Riikonen Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 12:25:46 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] typos --- README | 2 +- doc/CodingStyle | 2 +- doc/FAQ | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/README b/README index e9237fd3..a6933329 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ Following commands has been, at least partly, implemented: Changes/sets nickname. Note that in SILC there can be multiple same nicknames. However, the logic on working - with multiple nicknams on user interface is pretty much + with multiple nicknames on user interface is pretty much still missing. Also note that nicknames in SILC are case-sensitive. diff --git a/doc/CodingStyle b/doc/CodingStyle index 09aa8407..251deb91 100644 --- a/doc/CodingStyle +++ b/doc/CodingStyle @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ Using gotos Gotos are used in the SILC code quite often. If you know how to use goto's properly then it is ok to use them for example to optimize the -code. However, if you don' know how to use goto's do not use them. +code. However, if you don't know how to use goto's do not use them. Debug Messages diff --git a/doc/FAQ b/doc/FAQ index f5ce9e23..44d90566 100644 --- a/doc/FAQ +++ b/doc/FAQ @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ A: Answer for both question is no. IRC client is in no way compatible Q: Why client/server protocol is based on IRC? Would it be more interesting to implement something extensible and more powerful? -A: They are not, none the least. Have you read the protocol +A: They are not, not the least. Have you read the protocol specification? The client superficially resembles IRC client but everything that happens under the hood is nothing alike IRC. SILC could *never* support IRC because the entire network toppology is -- 2.24.0