updates

[runtime.git] / public_html / faq.html

diff --git a/public_html/faq.html b/public_html/faq.html
index 39eb90b78290c7ec84445a06b785b71234a2cef9..109e3358614f5b9185e6e1309d48b51e61e72185 100644 (file)
--- a/public_html/faq.html
+++ b/public_html/faq.html
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 align=center>
 <tr>
 <td>
+<font face="Arial,Helvetica,Sans-serif"> 
 <p>
 <font size=4>
 <h1>Frequently Asked Questions</h1>
@@ -15,7 +16,7 @@ align=center>
 A: SILC (Secure Internet Live Conferencing) is a protocol which provides
    secure conferencing services in the Internet over insecure channel.
    SILC is IRC like although internally they are very different.  Biggest
-   similiarity between SILC and IRC is that they both provide conferencing
+   similarity between SILC and IRC is that they both provide conferencing
    services and that SILC has almost same commands as IRC.  Other than
    that they are nothing alike.
 <p>
@@ -64,7 +65,7 @@ A: Answer for both question is no.  IRC client is in no way compatible
 
 <i>Q: Why client/server protocol is based on IRC? Would it be more
    interesting to implement something extensible and more powerful?</i><br>
-A: They are not, none the least.  Have you read the protocol specification?
+A: They are not, not the least.  Have you read the protocol specification?
    The client superficially resembles IRC client but everything that
    happens under the hood is nothing alike IRC.  SILC could *never*
    support IRC because the entire network toppology is different